patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!
Local Voices

The Sunday Political Brunch – Oct. 28, 2012

[Posting of this was delayed due to Sandy storm coverage...]

(Providence, Rhode Island) – We are now in the home stretch, with the final full week of campaigning. I am ready to vote; and, to have all the final votes counted. With that in mind, here are some of my weekly observations.

Where’s Mitt?– If Mitt Romney loses the election, it may come down to one unanswered question in the final debate on Libya. The moderator, Bob Schieffer of CBS News said, “The first question, and it concerns Libya. The controversy over what happened there continues. Four Americans are dead, including an American ambassador. Questions remain. What happened? What caused it? Was it spontaneous? Was it an intelligence failure? Was it a policy failure? Was there an attempt to mislead people about what really happened?” Romney gave a generic, polite, businesslike answer. He never attacked and never pushed or probed. Libya remains President Obama’s Achilles heel, and Romney’s greatest opportunity. I have been in this business a long time, and a week later I am still stunned at Romney’s tepid response.

What Were They Thinking? – I have heard various theories all week on why Romney failed to take the gloves off on Libya. One theory is that they were sitting down at the table, and that naturally makes the debate less confrontational. Another hypothesis was that polls indicate women don’t like confrontation and personal attacks in debates, and that in his efforts to close the gender gap we saw a “kinder, gentler” Romney. Theory number three suggests the public already “gets it” and knows the Obama White House really messed up in Libya. And finally, there is the theory Romney needed to look more “presidential” on foreign policy and that an angry, thrashing Mitt might send the wrong message to our allies, as well as voters at home. My own guess is that a combination of all four theories was at play. Had I been a Romney advisor, I would have been more aggressive on Libya.

The Obama Doctrine – On the other hand, President Obama needed to look more “presidential,” too. And at times, he didn’t. Obama got some digs in at Romney saying things such as, “I know you haven't been in a position to actually execute foreign policy – but every time you've offered an opinion, you've been wrong.” But at other times the President was also condescending and didn’t need to be. For example he said, "Well, governor, we also have fewer horses and bayonets, because the nature of our military's changed." And he added, "We also have things called aircraft carriers that planes land on and submarines that go under water." Those comments were roundly criticized, particularly in the military community. Still, this debate had a slight edge to President Obama. But he didn’t win the debate; so much as Romney lost it by passing on Libya.

Bringing It Back Home! – One place Romney did score points was on the economy. I said in last week’s column that the candidates needed to talk about the economy and how it is affected by foreign policy. Things such as gas prices and jobs are all affected by what happens overseas. The fact that 60 million people watched the debate means people were engaged on the number one issue – the economy – and that helped Romney. He was strong here, and the President wasn’t. Again, overall, I’d give the debate to Obama, but I would score it close – 53 Obama, 47 Romney, on a 100 point scale.

Ohio, Here They Come! – The candidates will spend a disproportionate amount of time in Ohio, Wisconsin, Iowa and New Hampshire in the next week. Most important now is Ohio. If Romney wins Ohio, he’s the next President. If he loses Ohio, he can still win by picking up Wisconsin, Iowa and New Hampshire, but that’s a tougher road. If the election were today, I still say Obama wins the Electoral College, but Romney wins the popular vote.

'Weather' Your Vote Matters! – Odd, unexpected things happen in campaigns, and severe weather can be one of them. Hurricane Sandy – and its aftermath – could disrupt or ever suppress voting in a key swing state such as Virginia. Right now, the storm is forecast to have the greatest impact on northeast Virginia (the Washington, DC) suburbs, which are a Democratic stronghold. But the storm could have far less impact in central, southern and western Virginia where the GOP is king. This could affect not only the presidential race, but the razor thin U.S. Senate race between Republican George Allen and Democrat Tom Kaine. Mother Nature could cast some crucial votes!

All Politics Is Local – The late House Speaker Tip O’Neill used to say, “All politics is local!” One of the things he meant by that is that voters are most affected by the politicians closest to them – their local and state officials. Voters also have the most access to these folks. With that in mind, I was honored to moderate the debate last Wednesday night for the District 30 House race in Rhode Island, between Republican Anthony Giarrusso, Democrat Mark Schwager, and Independent Kevin McDonough (photo above). They are vying to replace 24-year veteran lawmaker Bob Watson. These names are well known locally, but head scratchers for my national readers. I mention them, because to my readers in DC, California, Wisconsin, Florida and elsewhere, I urge you to pay attention to your state and local candidates. Yes, the presidential race and Congressional races garner all the headlines, but who represents you in your local city hall or statehouse is just as crucial. So, do your homework on races that are lower on the ballot!

As always, I welcome your thoughts and questions. Click the comment button at www.MarkCurtisMedia.com.

pam

1:50 pm on Tuesday, October 30, 2012

I think Romney responded perfectly to the asassinations in Libya and the Obama administrations lies and cover-ups. It is obvious that Romney would not have changed the minds of any liberals who are supporting Obama anyway. Even if they were to see the real-time video and the streams of e-mail exchanges that confirmed al-Qaeda affiliates were carrying out a planned asassination, they would still would not believe it. Romney looked presidental and the truth is coming out anyway as is evidenced by Obama's falling poll number's. The left seems to think that the right is pushing a lie to make political points before the election. If they were pushing a lie, that would be political suicide. The truth is on Romney's side and the ugly facts about what happened in Bengazi are only starting to come out. We may not know the whole truth until after the election but we do know that the Obama administration will probably continue to deceive and obfuscate because if the whole truth came out now he has no chance of being re-elected.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Naome Lixes

8:56 pm on Thursday, November 1, 2012

"Even if they were to see the real-time video and the streams of e-mail exchanges that confirmed al-Qaeda affiliates were carrying out a planned asassination, they would still would not believe it."

In so much as these don't exist, we don't believe it.

During the Bush years, the Republicans used to say it was unpatriotic to criticize the commander-in-chief when troops were in harm’s way — that it would endanger the lives of our soldiers and damage morale. It’s endlessly fascinating to me how this deeply heart-felt and often repeated declaration of wartime patriotism was entirely abandoned on January 20, 2009, and most dramatically on September 11, 2012, even while troops remain in harm’s way.

If you buy into this, Pam, you've been used by the Propagandists.

"We may not know the whole truth until after the election but we do know that the Obama administration will probably continue to deceive and obfuscate because if the whole truth came out now he has no chance of being re-elected."

Spare us the conspiracy theories.

Comment_arrow

J. Lane McMahon

1:40 pm on Sunday, November 4, 2012

Falling poll numbers? Did you flunk math? The poll numbers have barely moved in 7 months! Nate Silver is saying that President Obama has an 85%+ chance of re-election.

Romney would never push a lie for political gain....."Jeep will move to China"....Hahahahaha....Jeep has been in China since 1983! Fact!

Comment_arrow

mike

2:53 pm on Sunday, November 4, 2012

Obama is going to lose badly. Don't listen to Pravda they distort the truth when it comes to the annointed one. Benghazi would be on all day if someone not from the socialist party was in the White House.

Comment_arrow

mike

2:55 pm on Sunday, November 4, 2012

7 of 10 GM cars are built in China and after the Government takeover the CEO said they need to build more plants there.

Comment_arrow

J. Lane McMahon

3:56 pm on Sunday, November 4, 2012

mike,
You are 100% correct GM makes 7 out of every 10 cars in China....BECAUSE THEY SELL THEM THERE! China has been GM's most profitable market for quite some time. If your going to tell the truth, then tell the whole truth, not just the part you like.

And before you start with the garbage about "they should build them here and ship them"....China hits every imported car with a 25% tariff. Simple economics.

Comment_arrow

Joe Sousa.

4:08 pm on Sunday, November 4, 2012

Fair trade under OBONGO. We have no tariff so goods fly on to our shelves.
.China hits every imported car with a 25% tariff.
We need Romney who will take a tough stand with China.

Comment_arrow

mike

4:55 pm on Sunday, November 4, 2012

naomi stop drinking the kool aid

Comment_arrow

Naome Lixes

5:39 pm on Sunday, November 4, 2012

mike - do you where that phrase arose?

How many innocents died in Jonestown. Everytime one of you quacks uses that phrase to dismiss people who disagree, you dance on nearly a thousand graves.

Proud of yourself?

http://www.trutv.com/library/crime/notorious_murders/mass/jonestown/index_1.html

FYI - You're illustrating what's gone wrong with America and the rise of our version
of the Taliban - you can't hear anything outside your echo chamber.

You've been completely brainwashed by a propaganda machine, mike.
Give it a rest, Gramps.

SL

6:12 pm on Thursday, November 1, 2012

I find it appalling any woman could consider voting for the Romney/Ryan ticket. Their beliefs on woman will set us back. As women we need to consider everything,going backwards is ridiculous great example the right to choose to have an abortion. These two continue to throw Obama down stating gov. Shouldn't tell us what health care etc. Yet they want the gov. To decide about abortion....,give me a break. Romney states he is going to get us good jobs,who is he kidding. The economy is getting better look at the facts. I also would encourage anyone that believe's Romney's rhetoric to check the facts on Massachusetts he is not telling the facts about what he actually did. Good reason he had one term and guarantee he won't carry that state in this election.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Small Change

10:01 pm on Thursday, November 1, 2012

=I find it appalling any woman could consider voting for the Romney/Ryan ticket. Their beliefs on woman will set us back.=

That of course is the Democratic plan - pit women against men, black against white, straight against gay, public sector vs private.
For example, the way you actually create more jobs for women is to create more jobs for everybody. Not saddle small business with extra 'gender specific' regulations. Yes, it also creates more jobs for men. However, though you may not want to beleive it, that is a good thing.
While the Democrats may feel that making every issue an 'us vs them' is to their advantage, and they are probably correct, it is not to the advantage of the nation to continue to tear itself apart.

Comment_arrow

Ryanthegirl

12:30 am on Friday, November 2, 2012

Here is where both parties make me, as a mother of two and pro-choice, what to flip everyone the bird. In no way should abortion be a federal issue. I believe issue’s like abortion, being discussed on a federal level, should have died with introduction of church and state. At most it should be a states right to vote and not a “make or break” decision on a federal leader. I also believe that Romney’s ideas for this country do not include making abortion illegal. Nor do I believe that O’bama’s ideas are to make us a socialist country.

b kcaj

6:29 pm on Thursday, November 1, 2012

You're 100% right "SL". It would not only be appalling for any woman to cast a vote for the Romney/Ryan teabagger ticket, it would be appalling for any person of color, minority, same sex couple, or anyone with half a brain to vote for Romney/Ryan.

If those two creeps were ever elected, it would bring the country back to the days when people of color sat in the back of the bus, same sex couples were looked at and treated like circus freaks, and the preferred choice for birth control for women was a coat hanger and a dark alley.

This country needs to move forward-not backward, and it will be President Obama that moves this country forward.

Reply
Comment_arrow

A Taxpayer

8:42 pm on Thursday, November 1, 2012

Typical liberal rhetoric and lies.

Comment_arrow

Small Change

10:05 pm on Thursday, November 1, 2012

=You're 100% right "SL". It would not only be appalling for any woman to cast a vote for the Romney/Ryan teabagger ticket, it would be appalling for any person of color, minority, same sex couple, or anyone with half a brain to vote for Romney/Ryan.=

Precisely what I was referring to in my post above. Thank you for the excellent example.

Comment_arrow

Albert Cabestany

6:18 pm on Friday, November 2, 2012

b k, your mother and wife are teabaggers, Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan share values with the Tea Party, Taxed Enough Already. Let's get this fact straight.

Comment_arrow

b kcaj

9:36 pm on Friday, November 2, 2012

You seemed to have left out the fact, Mr.Cabestany, that if elected, teabagger Romney has stated publicly, on numerous occasions, that he would cut off federal funding for Planned Parenthood.

That statement alone should be more than enough for EVERY woman in America to cast their vote for President Obama.

Comment_arrow

mike

11:00 am on Sunday, November 4, 2012

small change so let me get this straight woman should vote for the murder of babies,sex between same sex, murder of the elderly, minorities held down by socialism and a party that tried to take God out of their platform. I don't believe you speak for many woman I know.

Comment_arrow

Naome Lixes

5:52 pm on Sunday, November 4, 2012

"...so let me get this straight woman should vote for the murder of babies,sex between same sex, murder of the elderly, minorities held down by socialism and a party that tried to take God out of their platform. I don't believe you speak for many woman I know." mike the clear-headed voice of Reason

Keep your religious superstitions out of my Government, thank you very much.
Why would anyone presume half of what you claim to be true?

Based on what fervid reading of policy?
Turn the tv OFF, already.

Comment_arrow

Small Change

7:53 am on Monday, November 5, 2012

=small change so let me get this straight woman should vote for the murder of babies,sex between same sex, murder of the elderly,==

What in the world are yout talking about? Can't you read?
I was decrying the Democrats playing the 'gender card' of 'we are not all in this together, this election is about women vs. men', and B kcaj made my point by playing the genderism/racism/sexual preferencism cards all in one sentence , as the Dems attempt to make everyone a victimized special interest group and have all of us at each other's throats.
And you read it as an attack on Republicans, and made the same divisive arguments from the other side. Nice work. This may come as a shock to most Patch posters, but words have meanings.

pam

8:50 pm on Thursday, November 1, 2012

I can't believe that any woman would vote for a man who thinks it is okay for a baby who survived a botched abortion to die in a garbage can and would vote against a law to protect the baby. They don't care at all for the countless baby girls killed by abortion or the mother's addicted to drugs and alcohol because they can't get over the fact that they killed their baby. (For anyone seeking help after an abortion Rachel's Vineyard is a Godsend.) Just because they want the taxpayer's to pick up the tab for birth control and abortion doesn't mean they care a whit about you either. They just want you available for sex without responsibility at all times.

Your rhetoric is over the top silliness. You didn't really believe Biden when he said "They are gonna put Ya'll back in chains." The man is a buffoon, who doesn't even know where he is half the time.

You say the country needs to move forward. Forward with what...more jobs lost, more trillions in debt and more people having to depend on food stamps to survive.
No thanks, we gave Obama a chance and he was a dismal failure. We thought he was cool in 2008 but now he is looking pathetic as he spends his last desperate days trying to hang on to a failed presidency. All he has left is to pit woman against men, rich against poor, white against black, and he was supposed to be the great healer who would bring us all together.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Naome Lixes

9:00 pm on Thursday, November 1, 2012

"Your rhetoric is over the top silliness."

Madame Pot, meet Miss Kettle.

"No thanks, we gave Obama a chance and he was a dismal failure."
By what measure? Facts matter - or is it 'truthiness' gnawing at you?

Do you suffer from Fox Geezer syndrome, Pam?
There's no cure, but the treatment is simple - less Fox, more facts.

Comment_arrow

Naome Lixes

9:01 pm on Thursday, November 1, 2012

"Just because they want the taxpayer's to pick up the tab for birth control and abortion doesn't mean they care a whit about you either. They just want you available for sex without responsibility at all times."

At last we get to the core of your resentment - young people still having sex.
Feel free to keep your superstitious religious hangups to yourself, m'Kay?

Comment_arrow

pam

9:16 pm on Thursday, November 1, 2012

How young would you like them having sex Naome? You are crude and rude as are many liberal posters. You really need to find some new material because your stuff is getting old and boring. How many times have you used Fox Geezer Syndrome?

Comment_arrow

Naome Lixes

9:43 pm on Thursday, November 1, 2012

"...your stuff is getting old and boring."
I wouldn't presume lecture you on your area of expertise.

To the mods - there's no mention of abortion or Benghazi in the OP.
There's already extensive discussion in The Patch about the Benghazi debacle and the Issa Inquisition that has followed.

If posters are insistent on rehashing the current crop of fabrications concerning
Benghazi from conspiracy sites (and Fox) they deserve all challenges that arise.

Note that when the most conservative voices meet resistance, they're immediate response is to consider it an affront and crude. If older people want to come into a public place and act as if they own it, they deserve no more respect than the rest.

Comment_arrow

Leave RI

9:00 pm on Friday, November 2, 2012

Agree with pam on some and Naome on other (topic on Benghazi)is not issue

Patch_comments_icon

Elizabeth McNamara

9:28 pm on Thursday, November 1, 2012

Naome and pam, please resist personal attacks as tempting as they obviously are. My red pen (i.e. the delete button) is officially out. Thanks.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jim Iezzi

9:45 pm on Thursday, November 1, 2012

Where has your red pen been for the last 2 weeks? Obviously not on the "I know nothing"… Hillary lies, the Ambassador dies thread. There are plenty of personal attacks there.

Patch_comments_icon

Elizabeth McNamara

9:49 pm on Thursday, November 1, 2012

You are right, Jim. I guess I police the blogs that originally post on my site more than those that are simply cross-posted. My bad.

Reply

Manifold Witness

7:58 am on Friday, November 2, 2012

The most important news right now?

New York and New Jersey and other parts of the United States are in need of food, water, electricity, gasoline and housing. Basic human needs are not being met. People have died. Friends and neighbors cannot mourn them properly. Friends and neighbors have lost everything, including not only loved ones but the irreplaceable memorabilia of a lifetime.

And another storm is on the way.

If this devastation was in another country, the USA would be pouring in all kinds of aid.

Mr. Obama stopped by. He hugged a few folks and made a few speeches. Warm and fuzzy love fest with Chris Christie who maybe wants to be the next president and maybe thinks it would be easier for him if Obama is re-elected.

Mr. Obama is back to campaigning when he should be at work. He’s crisscrossing the swing states with many stops in Ohio. Laughing as he bounds down the steps of Air Force One. Telling us all about how he will have the federal government get this done and how he will have them get that done.

But Mr. Obama isn’t ensuring that the federal government quickly meet the needs of our people during this crisis.

Ohio and everyone else should vote against Mr. Obama unless he gets to work and helps those who are in dire need in the USA.

Another storm is coming.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Naome Lixes

9:04 am on Friday, November 2, 2012

Um...

http://www.usnews.com/news/blogs/Ken-Walshs-Washington/2012/10/31/a-tale-of-two-storms-comparing-bush-and-obamas-hurricane-response

Nice try. "If this devastation was in another country, the USA would be pouring in all kinds of aid." There's what is really happening, on the ground and there's the twisted narrative you Tea Party hacks WANT to believe.

Not surprisingly, they're different.

http://www.dailyfinance.com/2012/10/31/hurricane-sandy-fema-election-obama-romney-visions/

If Obama dragged his feet in responding, you hacks would call him incompetent.
If he spends money rebuilding the most important city in the World, you'll call him "fiscally irresponsible" - it's never about what Obama does, is it?

It's all about who he is.

You don't like him, we get it.
Now go polish your Spam.

Comment_arrow

Ryanthegirl

7:58 pm on Friday, November 2, 2012

Surprise!! More links posted!!

Comment_arrow

10speed

8:25 pm on Friday, November 2, 2012

Well, if it were up to Mitt & the Repubs. they would keep the govt response for this disaster out of the equation. "let the private sector take over" ... and where exactly would the private sector be in this situation .... in the same boat as everyone else in NJ, NY, Conn etc. Take your rhetoric and try cooperating or coming to terms to make things work for all of us instead of the ten % of you who want to fight at every turn.

Comment_arrow

J. Lane McMahon

1:34 pm on Sunday, November 4, 2012

Manifold,
Your lies are going to catch up with you.
Even Christie and one of Romney's advisors admitted that President Obama and FEMA were doing a wonderful job. Yet despite this, you choose to try and lambast him over it.

If you feel the need to spread "propganda" at least try to make it realistic. And most of all, I have to say that the President's response to Sandy was MUCH better than the federal response to Katrina.

Comment_arrow

XBOXONE RULES

6:32 pm on Sunday, November 4, 2012

manifold witness 68% of americans approve of how the president has handled this disaster compared to 15% who disapprove

Tivie

3:30 pm on Friday, November 2, 2012

Uninspired by presidential politics? Aggravated? Is your only motivation in voting a wish to keep the other guy out of office? RI has a about a 100% chance of awarding its electoral votes to President Obama. So, not being a swing state, how can we put the FUN back into our dysFUNctional presidential election?

May I humbly suggest 3rd party voting?

Those lost votes that can implode elections in a swing state are still interesting here! Why? Because 3rd party candidates do some pretty fun things. Like offer “new ideas.” Voice “popular opinions.” Some even offer “detailed platforms!” In my next 4 posts, I’ll give info on some third-party candidates, including some of their positions, and links for details. Just as the Tea Party raised awareness of the rising federal deficit, and the Occupy Movement highlighted the transfer of American wealth to the 1%, it took relative outsiders to get those concerns into the national political conversation. Voting 3P can also help shift your favorite mainstream party left or right. What’s not to like about that?

PS Please vote - it's very important for local candidates!

Reply

Tivie

3:31 pm on Friday, November 2, 2012

3rd party, con't. Dr. Jill Stein, Green Party
http://www.jillstein.org/issues

The only female candidate, physician Jill Stein promotes a “Green New Deal” similar to FDR’s response to the depression. The Green party exists in @ 90 countries, and focuses on environmentalism, social justice, nonviolence, and grassroots democracy. It’s a major force in northern European countries like Germany, that have ambitious green technology programs.

-green initiatives
-universal healthcare/Medicare for all
-major infrastructure upgrades/right to work program
-scrap NAFTA
-raise minimum wage
-lower military spending
-tax reform targeting corporate loopholes & subsidies
-restore Glass-Steagall, break up big banks
-preserve Medicare & Social Security
-foreclosure moratorium, restructure loans
-student loan reform
-legalize medical marijuana
-repeal Patriot Act & NDAA civil liberty violations
-abolish the electoral college – direct voting

Reply
Comment_arrow

Ted Geisel

4:07 pm on Friday, November 2, 2012

* The only female candidate aside from Peta Lindsay of the Party for Socialism and Liberation. She is on the ballot next Tuesday.

Comment_arrow

Tivie

4:35 pm on Friday, November 2, 2012

Whoops, I didn't know about her! Learn something new every day. Here's what I found:

even more 3rd pary candidates....
Peta Lindsay, Socialism and Liberation Party
Peta LIndsey, at 28 years old, is actually barred from serving as president due to her age (you must be 35 years old to be president). The party for socialism and liberation is a marxist-leninist party in the US that desires to end capitalism.

http://www.pslweb.org/votepsl/2012/statements/10-point-program-lindsay-osorio-2012.html

-jobs a constitutional right
-healthcare, education, housing a right
-shut down military bases & bring troops home
-end mass incarceration
-pass employee free choice act
-abortion on demand
-gender equity in pay
-open borders
-LGTB rights
-end capitalism
-bank banks

Comment_arrow

mike

2:59 pm on Sunday, November 4, 2012

They don't call it global warming anymore because its a lie. Environmentalism is another form of control of the masses

Tivie

3:32 pm on Friday, November 2, 2012

3rd party, con't.
Rocky Anderson, Justice Party
http://www.justicepartyusa.org/

An American party founded by candidate Rocky Anderson, a former mayor of Salt Lake City, the Justice Party focuses on campaign finance and election reform, as well as economic, environmental, social and civic justice.
-green jobs & infrastructure
-raise cap on payroll taxes & end Bush tax cuts
-single payer health system
-ban mountaintop removal and tar sand extraction
-close overseas bases, reduce military expenditures
-abolish corporate “personhood”
-public campaign financing
-proportional representation
-enforce worker & environmental safeguards in trade agreements
-establish financial transaction tax
-marriage equality, ERA
-criminal justice reform
-protect whistle-blowers
-repeal Patriot Act, end National Security Letters

Reply
Comment_arrow

J. Lane McMahon

3:58 pm on Sunday, November 4, 2012

mike,
You need to brush up on the definition of communism

Comment_arrow

Naome Lixes

4:53 pm on Sunday, November 4, 2012

"Communism" in the world, according to mike -

Conservation of resources (the root of CONSERVAtive)
Public property versus corporate ownership of damn near everything
One person = one vote
Teeth in regulatory bodies, ie: A cell for Lloyd Blankfein and friends
Stop the government spying on us

More importantly, in the world according to mike - government checks for anyone else are socialist, his are "earned entitlements".

Tivie

3:32 pm on Friday, November 2, 2012

3rd party, con't. Gary Johnson, Libertarian Party
http://www.garyjohnson2012.com/issues

Gary Johnson is a businessman and former Republican Governor of New Mexico. The Libertarian Party emphasizes personal freedoms, including deregulated markets, less powerful government, strong civil liberties, separation of church and state, and open immigration.
-remove interstate commerce laws pertaining to healthcare
-balance federal budget
-privatize many government functions
-let states create their own Medicare & Medicaid programs
- revise social security
-audit the federal reserve
-abolish the IRS
-legalize marijuana
-reduce federal involvement in education
-reduce military interventions
-encourage free trade agreements
-strengthen privacy rights
-restrict environmental regulations
-simplify immigration

Reply

Tivie

3:33 pm on Friday, November 2, 2012

3rd party, cont
Virgil Goode, Constitution Party
http://www.goodeforpresident2012.com/the-issues.html

Former Virginia congressman Virgil Goode switched from Democrat to Republican, until accepting the Constitution Party nomination for President. The Constitution Party is a US conservative political party formerly known as the US Taxpayer’s party. The party focuses on immigration reform, as well as trying to interpret the founding father’s original intentions. Goode promises to run for only one term.

-moratorium on immigration, fence US-Mexican border
-English as official US language
-eliminate government foreign aid, arts, education programs
-energy independence focusing on domestic production
-sales tax or flat tax instead of income tax
-medical malpractice reform
-abolish “Obamacare”
-oppose gay marriage
-social security reform
-maintain capital punishment
-oppose abortion
-zero funding for planned parenthood
-block any proposed US-Mexico-Canada merger
-term limits for congress

Reply
Comment_arrow

Naome Lixes

5:05 pm on Friday, November 2, 2012

No fair, being funny.

"-block any proposed US-Mexico-Canada merger"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4o5WcLEuKu0

Comment_arrow

Leave RI

5:17 pm on Friday, November 2, 2012

Crap! now I have to scrape my Phil Steen sticker off my car...and end my dueling banjo lessons..

Tivie

4:47 pm on Friday, November 2, 2012

There are many other political parties that are interesting to learn about...some fun names, too (pirate party, objectivist party, modern whig party, for example), but I've outlined the details of those on the RI ballot.

Reply

b kcaj

9:24 pm on Friday, November 2, 2012

Joe Sousa says:

"It's refreshing to here from posters"

Sorry Joe, but even a second grader with a severe case of ADHD knows the difference between the word you used-"here", and the word you should have used "HEAR".

And you have the audacity to run for elected office?

Tiverton can do much better than you Joe.

Reply

Joe Sousa.

5:43 am on Saturday, November 3, 2012

We want more from Pam . It's refreshing to hear from posters that make sense and have a moral compass. Far to many O Zombies on this site spouting their liberal propaganda.
O ZOMBIES" . They flock to the polls voting for the man who will give them more Government hand outs. "O ZOMBIES" They want more from Government, and we know who will pay the bill. The kids in school who never had a chance $16 trillion and growing their greed knows no bounds.

Reply

b kcaj

6:15 am on Saturday, November 3, 2012

Well Joe, at least you have proven to the readers that you know how to cut and paste. The post above is the same one you've cut and pasted 6 times on different articles and then deleted it.

Time to get some new material Joe-Now put on your camo t-shirt, start up that bikerhd1998, clean the crumbs out of your beard, and get out on Stafford Rd. waving your silly campaign sign.

Reply

Steven

6:24 am on Sunday, November 4, 2012

I cannot believe how insanely uneducated most people spewing garbage on here are. A+B does not equal C. Most of what I read is regurgitated drivel from CNN and Fox News. Both parties are simply prying on your emotions so that you vote for them so they have a job. If you really think one person at the top makes that much of a difference, then you're missing the boat. And if one person does make that much of a difference, then we've grossly violated the Constitution. The most important elections are always the local ones, but they hardly get the air time necessary (kudos to the Patch for their coverage).

Reply
Comment_arrow

Naome Lixes

7:05 am on Sunday, November 4, 2012

The local actions of the Tea Party adherents are precisely why I challenge them,
here. Joe Sousa (see above) is running for office in Tiverton, RI.

The Tea Party has not been effective in setting public policy on a national stage,
they use rage, invective and activism against the only soft target in their range -
schools and public works.

"The Fish rots from the head first" - the underpinnings of their stated philosophy
are a grab-bag full of conspiracy theories (including a UN lead takeover of parks)
and "shoot first - ask questions later" foreign policy.

What set them off? Wall Street robbed us all and got away with it.

Their platform? Set the wolves free.
Some patriots.

rhoder222

11:14 am on Sunday, November 4, 2012

"You know me" stated by Barack Obama,... do we really? then, why sealed records on college? what could be so harmful to know? ok, go ahead and bring up Romney's tax returns - as I am sure you will in deflective response. Yup, he makes lots of money and probably takes advantage of existing tax havens, as all do, but he created his wealth and many companies that support American employees- I shop in those companies.
I know that Mr. Obama said he did not deserve to be elected again if he didn't fulfill his campaign promises of 2008, and he hasn't. Mr. Obama said he would "bring people together" and "would work across the Party lines" and that hasn't worked out so well.
We now have additional Govt. jobs - the positions are called "Czars" - interesting term...
I still remember the Obama Care being signed in as law, without most reading it, or understanding it, and Nancy Pelosi telling people to just sign it, the details will come later - really? Which reminds me of Nancy Pelosi's comments the day after the Democrat Convention when a "Vote for God" was controversial and a reporter was questioning her on this - she waived her arm in a fanning motion quickly and said "its over, its over...move on...its over"
Mr. Obama has bowed to the Saudi King, but not the English Queen. Mr. Obama is proud of the Whitehouse Brewery - great, but who paid for that? Was it necessary to have one installed in the Whitehouse?
Watch the old movie "The Candidate" w/ Robert Redford - look familar?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Naome Lixes

12:15 pm on Sunday, November 4, 2012

" then, why sealed records on college?"
Federal law prohibits this, and no prior President has done it, either.
You're rehashing the same tired conspiracy theories we've countered, four years now.
http://www.factcheck.org/2012/07/obamas-sealed-records/

"Romney... but he created his wealth and many companies that support American employees- I shop in those companies." Romney embodies economic parasite.
http://www.salon.com/2012/10/19/how_mitt_romney_made_a_fortune_off_the_auto_bailout/

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/sep/24/mitt-romney-self-creation-myth

"We now have additional Govt. jobs - the positions are called "Czars" - interesting term." You can thank the Nixon administration for this tongue-in-cheek term.
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,908276,00.html

"I know that Mr. Obama said he did not deserve to be elected again if he didn't fulfill his campaign promises of 2008, and he hasn't."
http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/02/fact-check-obama-and-the-one-term-proposition/

Do you suffer from Fox Geezer syndrome, rhoder222?
It's not as if we haven't heard (and discredited) this blather, before - Ad Nauseum.

It's as if you True Believers can't fathom the rest of us discounting this for what it
really is - propaganda fed to the most gullible electorate.

Give it a rest.

Portsmouth Neighbor

12:43 pm on Sunday, November 4, 2012

Eva Langoria's foul tweets, tweets about rioting if Romney "steals" the election, MoveOn (Michael Moore's) political ads where the grandmothers are using profanity, Bill Maher's racist comments - the Republicans would be CRUCIFIED if they spouted this ignorance and hate (case in point idiots Limbaugh and Akin). Don't care about party, I will vote for someone who seems to have some class and does not bring a crooked political machine to the highest office in the nation. I'm sick of it.

Reply
Comment_arrow

rhoder222

1:20 pm on Sunday, November 4, 2012

Dear Portsmouth Neighbor - Mr. Obama is charismatic, charming, at times, and Hollywood and some of the media have mutual admiration and it seems, adoration of Mr. Obama, and he seems to very much enjoy that life style as well. I think it is a perfect combination - this year I vote for Mr. Obama to go to Hollywood.

rhoder222

12:53 pm on Sunday, November 4, 2012

I believe you are suffering from Obamaitis. I am not a "Fox Geezer" or "True Believer" whatever that is..What is that? By the way, I am writing by myself - singular, please don't address me as if I am a group. I am Independant for Political affilations, I vote for the person, not the Party. I will vote for some Democrats and some Republicans this year..perhaps you may want to "give it a by rest" in your accusatory responses, you may feel better with a rest, as you are writing like an uptight, edgy , nervous, anxious soul that really, really needs to get some rest, calmness and perhaps, something else meaningful in your life. Maybe try using your energy for creative positives, maybe some volunteer work, by the way, who are "the rest of us"? I certainly hope that there is not a community of people as hard and vicious as you are. You have intelligence, add some compassion, thoughtfulness, throw in a little kindness, maybe fun and take a break - you seem too radical, not an effective way to win over anyone to your belief.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Naome Lixes

1:59 pm on Sunday, November 4, 2012

"You have intelligence, add some compassion, thoughtfulness, throw in a little kindness, maybe fun and take a break - you seem too radical, not an effective way to win over anyone to your belief."

You're kidding, right?

You spout the propaganda line, based entirely on purely partisan quackery and you lecture on compassion and kindness? If you're willing to regurgitate what amounts to slander you deserve neither consideration or tolerance.

I want my country back from the pitchfork waving mob.

You're either with us Americans, or you're a willing tool of those undermining
what remains of our all-too fragile democracy.

Which is it?

J. Lane McMahon

1:29 pm on Sunday, November 4, 2012

Most of you need to seriously grow up. Try taking a look at some other news sources besides Fox and MSNBC. The hateful rhetoric is getting a little old.

To the Democrats: Obama is not the second coming.
To the Republicans: Telling a lie, even a thousand times, does not make it true.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Naome Lixes

1:57 pm on Sunday, November 4, 2012

Amen, Reverend.
I'm no fan of Obama.

I absolutely detest what has happened to reporting in America - it's a freak show.

Comment_arrow

10speed

2:23 pm on Sunday, November 4, 2012

Naome... No fan of the reverend on this end.

Naome Lixes

2:12 pm on Sunday, November 4, 2012

When Mitt Romney said, "Let Detroit go bankrupt." he meant, "Let me pick over the carcass and sell off the choicest cuts." He not only came out and said what he means, he's done it. Mitt Romney and his investing partners took bailout money from the US Taxpayers and sold out the American workers at GM's Delphi parts division to China - for cheap labor.

That's the vision Mitt Romney has for America - more for him and his partners,
while we scrape to pay the bills. Romney's take? $15,000,000.

His investment? $1,000,000 plus. I don't know what is most striking about this;
the "spare" millions to invest, the breathtaking ROI or the obvious conflict of interest
from someone seeking the highest office.

http://www.toledoblade.com/local/2012/11/02/UAW-says-Romney-got-15M-from-auto-bailout.html
http://www.thenation.com/article/170644/mitt-romneys-bailout-bonanza#

This is the best the GOP could do?

Huntsman 2016

Reply

rhoder222

2:50 pm on Sunday, November 4, 2012

I agree about the news reporting - no longer fair or unbiased!! They should not consider themselves journalists or reporters.

Reply
Comment_arrow

J. Lane McMahon

4:00 pm on Sunday, November 4, 2012

IF that's a documentary, then Rocky and Bullwinkle must be Shakespeare.

Joe Sousa.

4:12 pm on Sunday, November 4, 2012

Where has this administration been as American Jobs are lost Four years of failure by this Administration .
U.S. trade officials said their World Trade Organization case goes after Chinese government grants and other subsidies that have helped the Asian giant rise to the fifth-largest auto and auto parts exporter in 2011, from 16th in 2002.

"These are subsidies that directly harm working men and women on the assembly lines in Ohio and Michigan and across the Midwest," Obama told a campaign rally. "We are going to stop it. It is not right, it is against the rules, and we will not let it stand."

Republicans, including presidential nominee Mitt Romney, who has accused Obama of not being tough enough with Beijing, cast the move by the Democratic White House as a blatant effort to sway votes in an election battleground state.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Joe Sousa.

4:16 pm on Sunday, November 4, 2012

Pet Food Poison
For the first time, investigators are saying the chemical that has sickened and killed pets in the United States may have been intentionally added to pet food ingredients by Chinese producers.

Food and Drug Administration investigators say the Chinese companies may have spiked products with the chemical melamine so that they would appear, in tests, to have more value as protein products.

Officials now suspect this possibility because a second ingredient from China, rice protein concentrate, has tested positive for melamine. So has corn gluten shipped to South Africa. That means there is a possibility for another round of recalls.

Comment_arrow

Joe Sousa.

4:17 pm on Sunday, November 4, 2012

Consumers were advised yesterday to discard all toothpaste made in China after federal health officials said they found Chinese-made toothpaste containing a poison used in some antifreeze in three locations: Miami, the Port of Los Angeles and Puerto Rico.

Comment_arrow

Joe Sousa.

4:20 pm on Sunday, November 4, 2012

China manufactured every one of the 24 kinds of toys recalled for safety reasons in the United States so far this year, including the enormously popular Thomas & Friends wooden train sets, a record that is causing alarm among consumer advocates, parents and regulators.

A worker at a factory in Dongguan, China, uses a marker to touch up the paint on toy trains. Several Dongguan factories make Thomas toy trains.
Enlarge This Image
Ryan Pyle for The New York Times

A worker closes a box of toy trains. Last week 1.5 million trains and components were recalled because they were coated with lead paint.

The latest recall, announced last week, involves 1.5 million Thomas & Friends trains and rail components — about 4 percent of all those sold in the United States over the last two years by RC2 Corporation of Oak Brook, Ill. The toys were coated at a factory in China with lead paint, which can damage brain cells, especially in children.

Comment_arrow

Joe Sousa.

4:25 pm on Sunday, November 4, 2012

In 2008, China's largest provider of milk powder recalled 700 tons of baby formula after one child died and more than 50 others developed kidney problems. Melamine, a chemical used in the making of plastic, was found in the baby formula; it later emerged that unscrupulous manufacturers had been adding it to food products to cheaply boost protein values. The revelations only further damaged China's reputation in production

Comment_arrow

Joe Sousa.

4:26 pm on Sunday, November 4, 2012

WASHINGTON -- Chinese manufacturers made more than half of the goods that the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission recalled last year, but few of them paid any price for producing defective wares.

Comment_arrow

Naome Lixes

4:31 pm on Sunday, November 4, 2012

Perhaps we should start with auto parts, and clawback jobs sent to slave labor camps.

http://delphi.com/about/careers/locations/china/

You're going to blame Obama for an open trade approach on one hand, and call him a socialist on the other? That's not exactly coherent, is it Joey?

Which is it - we were all for Free Markets, last month...

Let's face it, you're not ABOUT anything Joe.
You don't like Obama - we gittit.

Naome Lixes

4:45 pm on Sunday, November 4, 2012

It's telling that this trade imbalance is an important issue, now.
Given that one of the citations is from 2008 - why wait?

Oh yeah... http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/romney-ryan-slam-obama-administration-china-currency-manipulation/story?id=17472397#.UJbfMWdQTT8

You do know that Romney personally profited from sending American jobs to China
- doncha Joe? What's that smell? Um.... "Hypocrisy" the new cologne for 1%ers.
http://www.thenation.com/article/170644/mitt-romneys-bailout-bonanza

Obama's actual record, dealing with China and the trade imbalance...
http://www.cfr.org/us-election-2012/candidates-us-policy-toward-china/p26883

http://blogs.cfr.org/campaign-2012/2012/09/17/midday-update-romney-obama-pivot-back-to-economy/

Math matters, if you're doing arithmetic.

Reply

Joe Sousa.

5:06 pm on Sunday, November 4, 2012

7.9 % unemployment
Economists polled by CNNMoney were expecting 120,000 jobs to be added in the month, and the unemployment rate to remain unchanged.

The unemployment rate fell largely because 368,000 people stopped looking for work, many of them young people. Just 63.5% of the working-age population was either employed or actively looking for work -- a 30-year low.

"These numbers are not very strong," said Joseph LaVorgna, chief U.S. economist at Deutsche Bank. "The job market is improving, but only gradually."

At least 150,000 jobs need to be created each month to simply keep pace with the growing population.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Joe Sousa.

5:08 pm on Sunday, November 4, 2012

Four years and America is worse off. Do the math. It's the economy stupid !

Comment_arrow

Naome Lixes

5:30 pm on Sunday, November 4, 2012

It's never been about what happens on Obama's watch with you detractors - is it?

Reagan got re-elected with nearly the same performance profile, selling the electorate on the "Trickle down" fiction which paved the way for today's debt load.

The difference? The gullible electorate bought the snake oil pitch in 1984.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2012/10/05/barack-obama-2012-ronald-reagan-1984/

Two things, Joe - you don't attribute the quotes you so freely steal
(http://money.cnn.com/2012/09/07/news/economy/august-jobs-report/index.html)

and the data isn't current - this quote is from September.

Nice try, but America is in better shape that ever, no matter how many times
you repeat the Koch Brothers official lines.

I'm all for running the numbers - where are yours?
http://www.usnews.com/opinion/blogs/robert-schlesinger/2012/09/03/america-is-definitely-better-off-under-obama
So, is Obama the anti-Reagan?

Comment_arrow

Naome Lixes

5:46 pm on Sunday, November 4, 2012

When the Patch charges us 10 cents to put in our 2 cents worth, it will be.

no regr allia b

6:16 pm on Sunday, November 4, 2012

Employment always ticks up a notch after October 1st. It is because the seasonal hiring starts. This happens till February 1st when the seasonal help is laid off after the surplus inventory sales are done so the companies can ease their tax liability on surplus inventory. Same happens May 1st for the summer seasonal workers. The vast majority of these jobs are part time and temporary. Very simple common sense and no need for spin when it is obvious to the average person.
Bottom line is that right now unemployment is stagnated, as is the economy. Not exactly something Obama can even discuss which he does not, other than same exact words from 2008. He makes the peanut farmer look good. Just an opinion

Reply
Comment_arrow

b kcaj

7:52 pm on Sunday, November 4, 2012

And a pretty lousy opinion Jack-Looks like Romney is going down to defeat-almost time for the fat lady to sing!

Comment_arrow

b kcaj

8:00 pm on Sunday, November 4, 2012

Wow Jack-Since when did you become an economist? Did you graduate from the Wharton School of Business? Did you earn a PhD in economics from Harvard?

Please Jack, share your credentials with the readers, so they can strive to be the genius that you are, or purport to be.

Cranston Voter

7:09 pm on Sunday, November 4, 2012

Cranston Voter
@ Manifold Witness I agree with you 100% The National Guard should have invaded NY and NJ as soon as the storm was over, bringing food, water, medical supplies, and other essentials necessary to help these unfortunate victims of the storm survive. But what do we get, more broken promises. This administration is unprerared for any kind of emergency. The US sends more supplies quicker and faster over seas to people who hate us, but can't them to NY and NJ. It's disgraceful, upsetting, and unacceptable. It's like watching a Chinese fire drill at best. With Obama, Biden and their cheer leader Nancy Pelosi (all she needs is a pom pom and shakers) we are all in harms way. God help us all. If anyone from the ACLU sees this, sorry I forgot to ask your permission before I wrote it. Since you have spent so much time here in Cranston over the past couple of months, my belief is that you will be setting up your world headquarters here! Vote Romney

Reply
Comment_arrow

J. Lane McMahon

8:04 pm on Sunday, November 4, 2012

Of course, you do know that the National Guard can only be activated in a state by that state's Govenor, right?
You want President Obama to send armed troops into a state?????????

The National Guard was on the ground in NY and NJ during the storm, and were handing out water and food within hours of the storm passing.

Stop telling fairytales, it makes you look stupid.

Comment_arrow

Naome Lixes

8:51 pm on Sunday, November 4, 2012

There was a Federal response, as requested by the governors:

New York National Guard: Over 3,500 Guard personnel and 604 vehicles are supporting relief efforts. New York National Guard is conducting high-water evacuations and transportation out of the five boroughs and continues supporting power restoration, traffic control, debris removal, wellness checks, and food/water distribution. They are the designated water and petroleum distribution for all supported state agencies. They have five military police companies conducting presence patrols, traffic control points, and augmentation of local law enforcement agencies. The New York National Guard 2nd CST has deployed their Unified Command Suite and providing communications support to the Nassau County Office of Emergency Management.

New Jersey National Guard: 2,029 National Guard personnel on duty. Assisting New Jersey State Police and Fire Department with rescues, security, and evacuations. Conducting debris clearance/removal, high water vehicle operations, shelter support, food and water distribution, and power generation.

http://www.enewspf.com/latest-news/latest-national/military-casualties/38037-update-on-the-dod-and-national-guard-response-to-hurricane-sandy-november-4-2012.html

"This administration is unprerared for any kind of emergency. The US sends more supplies quicker and faster over seas to people who hate us, but can't them to NY and NJ." Except when they do, pinhead.

Comment_arrow

Naome Lixes

8:54 pm on Sunday, November 4, 2012

"The National Guard should have invaded NY and NJ as soon as the storm was over, bringing food, water, medical supplies, and other essentials necessary to help these unfortunate victims of the storm survive."

Sunday the 28th, they were saddle up. Where did you come up with this?
It's as if you WANT to believe the worst about Obama, is that it?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TU3n2Ba_5jY

Comment_arrow

Naome Lixes

9:02 pm on Sunday, November 4, 2012

"If anyone from the ACLU sees this, sorry I forgot to ask your permission before I wrote it. Since you have spent so much time here in Cranston over the past couple of months, my belief is that you will be setting up your world headquarters here! Vote Romney"

You should apologize to the people that pumped out RI, back in 2010.
They're the same people in New Jersey, today.

Are you REALLY this clueless, or just trolling for a fight?
http://envstudies.brown.edu/reports/EmergencyManagement.pdf

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uBdZN3tTo34&feature=fvwrel

Joe Sousa.

7:20 pm on Sunday, November 4, 2012

We can blame the Senators from RI as well. They talk about jobs but have done little to save them. They pass over the top regulations on American Companies while allowing countries like China to flood our shelves with cheap goods. They pollute the air , water and steal our companies patterns. Whitehouse and Reed are doing nothing to stop them.

Reply
Comment_arrow

b kcaj

7:50 pm on Sunday, November 4, 2012

Hey Joe-Have you seen the latest presidential polls-things are looking pretty bleak for your by Romney.

Should we confiscate all sharp objects and prescription sleeping pills from your house?

Comment_arrow

J. Lane McMahon

11:39 am on Monday, November 5, 2012

Don't forget about that House of Reps blocking the Jobs bill....Oh wait...that would be the REPUBLICAN controlled House....

Cranston Voter

7:56 am on Monday, November 5, 2012

Cranston Voter
@ Naome Not trolling for a fight, just expressing my opinion on the situation. Of course I know National Guard can only be activated by the Governor of the state. However the everyday person realizes Obama's photo op empty promises visit pledging support and whatever it takes to get Ny and NJ back on their feet was merely a campaign stunt (that may back fire) because he left so quickly to continue campaigning. All the back slapping, and hand shaking isn't going to help those poor people. It's ACTION that counts! The Fed Gov has once again failed to deliver in a timely fasion! Lastly please refrain from name calling (pinhead).

Reply
Comment_arrow

J. Lane McMahon

9:48 am on Monday, November 5, 2012

I guess Fox news didn't tell you about the fuel supplied by our military, or the MRE's being handed out, or the NG vehicles being used as polling places. How about the Army helicopters being used to transport wounded and sick? Wait, did Fox news commit a lie of ommission? Hard to believe.

Comment_arrow

Naome Lixes

9:56 am on Monday, November 5, 2012

So Sunday you said:

"The National Guard should have invaded NY and NJ as soon as the storm was over, bringing food, water, medical supplies, and other essentials necessary to help these unfortunate victims of the storm survive. But what do we get, more broken promises. This administration is unprerared for any kind of emergency."

Today, the problem is that the response was too fast?

"All the back slapping, and hand shaking isn't going to help those poor people. It's ACTION that counts! " You mean, like mobilizing the Air National Guard, declaring a disaster area and sending FEMA into high gear?

How can you see the same things as the rest of us and come to your conclusions?
I'll refrain from name calling when you no longer insist that stupidity is wisdom.

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/10/30/christie-praises-obama-doesnt-give-a-damn-about-romney-photo-op/

Scott Clark

11:25 am on Monday, November 5, 2012

Reading this thread you'd think we'd be one of the swing states :)

I don't care who anyone votes for. Just please be sure you know what you're getting.

The glamor contest they try to make the Presidential Election about is far less important than the upper and lower houses of Congress. Further, both candidates are going to be surrounded by their party's premiere advisors. Whoever wins will bring people who have been pushing party agenda through predecessors dating back to Reagan.

The sensationalist hyperbole used to talk about issues is wonderful for the media and their advertisement business model; however, as we've seen in the last few elections, the country is getting tired of the partisan gridlock. We're being stretched by the wingnut edges on both sides and not getting any serious work done. That drives the impression that one party or the other "needs" to win a filibuster proof majority just so they can roughshod over any dissension.

But if that's your chief wish, you might as well extend it to its logical conclusion that we need to coronate our next king just so we can get something done.

We all know how well THAT has gone in the past few millennia :)

Democratic republics don't work that way.

Reply

Leave a comment