patching...
Breaking: Johnston cancels Memorial Day Ceremony: http://patch.com/A-43vY »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!
Local Voices

Banish The Master Lever


The time for the Master Lever has passed – if there ever was one. It’s time to take it out of our election process – but your voice needs to be heard.

The “Master Lever” is a political habit we backed into. (Call it “master lever” or straight-party voting – it’s the same thing). In the early days of political parties, it was nearly impossible not to vote on a straight party line basis; ballots were printed on colored paper, a different color for each party. With the advent of modern voting machines in the 1880s, colored ballots were replaced by a single button, or lever, that allowed a voter to cast a vote for the candidates of a single party. That mechanism has never disappeared in Rhode Island.

The fairness and corruption problems associated with straight party voting notwithstanding, the arguments for a master lever fall aside when more than two or so parties are involved.

Using the master lever to vote for a party fielding a partial slate of candidates results in votes not being cast for some offices. And applying the master lever as it is done in Rhode Island means many third-party candidates and virtually all candidates in non-partisan races go un-voted for – even though the voter is convinced he voted in every race. But that’s not the way it works.

Rhode Island remains in the minority here, one of only 16 states still caught up in straight-ticket voting. But the wave of change is building: legislation prohibiting the master lever is under consideration in three states (Rhode Island, Iowa and Indiana), and five others (Missouri, New Mexico, Texas, Utah and New Hampshire) are considering changes involving straight-ticket voting procedures.

Rhode Island legislation provides the clearest action – elimination of straight-party voting – in H-5072 (which I have co-sponsored together with Democratic Representatives Marcello, Hearn and Hull, and Republican Minority Leader Brian Newberry), and S-44, sponsored by Republican Senator David Bates of Barrington.

Rejecting master lever voting makes sense. It reinforces the already-strong (and increasingly dysfunctional) power of incumbency. It requires no voter to investigate or consider carefully the candidates before them. It is a key driver of one-party government. It disenfranchises voters wishing to vote for third-party and nonpartisan candidates, or those who focus more on the candidate and less on the party.

There is a growing chorus favoring its elimination. Governor Chafee, Lt. Governor Roberts, Secretary of State Mollis, State Treasurer Gina Raimondo, the R.I. Board of Elections, Moderate Party founder Ken Block, Common Cause, every Republican member of the RI House and Senate – and many thoughtful Democrats – are all on board.

But we are not enough – House Speaker Gordon Fox and Senate President Teresa Paiva Weed need to be convinced that there is a significant public benefit served if this is to happen.

If you think the master lever and straight-ticket voting has outlived its usefulness as I do, let them know your views. Login to masterlever.org, learn more abut the issue, and find out who else from your community has signed on. Then, scroll to the bottom of the page and send a letter to those who control the destiny of this important legislation.

It’s very easy and takes five minutes. Your voice needs to be heard. And on this issue, it can.

State Representative Anthony Giarrusso was elected to his first term in November, 2012. His district, House 30, covers East Greenwich and the southeast portion of West Greenwich.

Jack Baillargeron

12:00 pm on Friday, February 15, 2013

The master lever is an evil mechanism to keep the ill informed from voting on issues and individuals. It has always surprised me the number of people who fall for that, and do not see the evil it is. Just drones led to slaughter is all it does.

Reply

nagaer40

3:05 pm on Friday, February 15, 2013

I call it the status quo lever. You don't know anything about anything, but you do know that if you draw that line next the big "D" everything will stay the same. The same people will stay in office, we will still have all the same problems like failing education, roads, unemployment and the highest taxes in the nation.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jack Baillargeron

3:08 pm on Friday, February 15, 2013

Sadly you are very correct on that ;-{.

Rev. Shaw Moore

3:52 pm on Friday, February 15, 2013

This is Rhode Island. The Master Lever serves the needs of the Democrat party. If you remove it, the victims and blue hairs might actually have to think before they voted and that is not wanted.

Reply

Govstench

6:34 pm on Friday, February 15, 2013

I consider the Master Lever as "lazy voting." You want to do your civic duty but could be bothered in knowing the candidates. It's amazing that this mechanism has survived this long on the books. It does disenfranchise the local tickets like East Providence candidates as they are all on a non-partisian status. If it is eliminated from the ballot, it will be interesting to see what the future election results will be like.

Reply

Dorothy O'Gara

12:42 pm on Saturday, February 16, 2013

If in fact, the Master Lever is "lazy voting" and it favors Rhode Island Democratic candidates, please explain why, even though we have an overwhelming one-sided legislature, we have elected a record number of Republican governors. Is it just possible that Rhode Island voters really do know how to split their vote? Then, there is also the matter of choice; many candidates are unopposed.

In fifty-eight years of voting, I have used the Master Lever as an option three times. In all three instances, there was not a candidate worthy of my splitting my vote and the ballot was loaded with time consuming referenda.

If it is eliminated, I, too, will be interested to see if and how future elections will be affected.

Reply

BD

1:37 pm on Saturday, February 16, 2013

I love the simpletons and Fox News watchers/conspiracy theorists that think this is a real issue. I'd like to see any evidence that the “Master Lever” favors one party over another. Maybe if some of these losing candidates appealed a little more to voters they wouldn't have to blame the lever for their losses.

I think what would please these folks most of all would be to banish the master lever for democrats only. How does that sound?

Reply
Comment_arrow

mike westman

3:42 pm on Monday, February 18, 2013

I doubt they push the issue in Kansas

Leo

5:19 pm on Saturday, February 16, 2013

Don't blame the lever for the irrelevance of the Republican party! The voters are not stupid enough to pull that lever. The only hope the GOP has is to rig the maps to change the electoral college votes--the most evil idea they have come up with yet. Right up there with discouraging voters in Democratic districts with long lines. They are an embarassment to democracy.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Leave RI

9:28 pm on Sunday, February 17, 2013

Don't blame the lever for the irrelevance of the Democratic party! The voters are not stupid enough to pull that lever. The only hope the DNC has is to rig the maps to change the electoral college votes--the most evil idea they have come up with yet. Right up there with discouraging voters in Republican districts with long lines. They are an embarrassment to democracy.
Too easy...boiler plate language..I fixed your spell check too..now go "occupy" parasite park with a mike check and some American Criminal Lover Union peeps.

Bill Carson

6:48 pm on Saturday, February 16, 2013

Representative Michael Marcello has introduced legislation (H 5072) on this issue, and the bill has been assigned to the House Judiciary Committee. A public hearing will be held on the bill .

They will certainly weigh the pros and cons of the testimony that is offered.

I encourage you all to continue to correspond with members of the General Assembly. Thank you Bill

Reply

William F Horan

7:04 pm on Saturday, February 16, 2013

Based on some of the reply's - in RI education was long ago replaced with a socialist indoctrination . Yes, where tools necessary for citizens to manage a constitutional republic were almost eliminated. Yes, tools starting with those necessary for independent adult critical thinking skills. Today the results are self evident with the collective capacity and capability of citizens and a government that reflects their unbelievable ignorance, arrogance and incompetence..

Reply
Comment_arrow

RI Teabagger

10:53 pm on Saturday, February 16, 2013

Ya, what this guy said. And don't blame me, I voted for Dan Gordon.

Joe Sousa

4:55 am on Sunday, February 17, 2013

Low Information Voters deserve no tool that makes it easy. If you don't take the time to at least learn the names of the candidates don't vote.

Reply

Just Another Taxpayer

7:08 am on Sunday, February 17, 2013

Those posters that support the elimination of the lever system do so because somehow lead voters to pick Republican candidates. Republican candidates do not win in RI because most of them fail to offer an alternative vision for the state. When this starts to happen, then more Republicans will start getting elected to office.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Leo

7:19 am on Sunday, February 17, 2013

Agreed! That is the real reason that us "low information" voters will not vote Republican! You have NOTHING to offer yet you have the audacity to accuse us of "unbelievable ignorance, arrogance and incompetence." Wow!

Comment_arrow

mike westman

3:36 pm on Monday, February 18, 2013

Despite their machinations about the inefficiency and corruption on the progressive side of the aisle.....the real truth is that the righties are running scared in most places where people out number cows. This is another (although not so horrible) attempt to suck up a few more votes out of a sponge that is really getting dry for the repubs.

Just Another Taxpayer

7:09 am on Sunday, February 17, 2013

My previous post should read "because somehow it will lead"

Reply

BD

7:25 am on Sunday, February 17, 2013

Look, many of us are not supporters of the "Low Information Voters" (more commonly known as Fox News believers); but that doesn't mean we should make it more difficult for them to vote.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/kenrapoza/2011/11/21/fox-news-viewers-uninformed-npr-listeners-not-poll-suggests/

Reply
Comment_arrow

Leave RI

9:39 pm on Sunday, February 17, 2013

Look, many of us are not supporters of the "Low Information Voters" (more commonly known as MSNBC believers); but that doesn't mean we should make it more difficult for them to vote.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/10/24/juan-williams-npr-firing-fox-news-sunday_n_772993.html
Dumpster diving..at best.

Comment_arrow

Bill Carson

10:19 pm on Sunday, February 17, 2013

Low information voters, also known as LIVs or misinformation voters, are people who may vote, but who are generally poorly informed about politics.

Is the Low-Information Voter really stupid or do they just not care enough to follow daily politics?

This is the new buzz phrase, "Low information" voters. I call them "low information" people, the people who sit in front of their TVs watching cartoons all day.

That's why they need to do away with the Master Lever

Comment_arrow

Leave RI

11:40 am on Monday, February 18, 2013

Yes Bill..unfortunately instead of analyzing the facts of the issue..the LIVs will watch far left or right opinion and agenda driven discussion shows lamely disguised as "___ news" (fill in the blank. I can dumpster dive all day for a counter opinion. It doesn't have anything to do with the resolve of the issue though)..I don't like the master lever but I do like a good Bugs Bunny or Thunderbirds are go!

Comment_arrow

mike westman

3:38 pm on Monday, February 18, 2013

Leave....being one of those 'low info' voters....rather that and your perception of all that than....than..a mis-informed voter that has bs swimming feverishly around their serotonin challenged little brains

Bill Carson

7:40 pm on Sunday, February 17, 2013

Quote:

"“While the master lever option does make the voting process quicker for some, the controversy surrounding its use has unfairly called into question the legitimacy and fairness of elections,” said Representative Marcello. “Eliminating the master lever will end the speculation that somehow election outcomes would be different.”

In a statement issued last week, Gov. Lincoln Chafee also called for the elimination of the master lever in Rhode Island, saying that “any mechanism that contributes to voter confusion – and worse, voter disenfranchisement – should not be on the ballot.” Calls to end the use of the master lever have also come from Secretary of State A. Ralph Mollis, Warwick Mayor Scott Avedisian, Cranston Mayor Allan Fung and Moderate Party founder Ken Block, among other state and municipal leaders.

According to information from the state Board of Elections, about 24 percent of voters in the November, 2012, election used the master lever option."

http://webserver.rilin.state.ri.us/News/pr1.asp?prid=8761

Reply

Emilio DiSpirito

10:32 pm on Sunday, February 17, 2013

This is a great issue and I'm glad you brought it up Anthony. We all have those friends who mock our right to vote and claim it's "fixed" or that their vote "does not matter". I urge all my friends Democrat or Republican to share this blog and issue at hand with your friends and family - why you ask? Well, if our individual vote "does not matter", then why would this be an issue?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Just Another Taxpayer

7:34 am on Tuesday, February 19, 2013

Who is claiming their individual right to vote does not matter? Instead of worrying about whether a state employs a master lever system, maybe they should be more concerned with voter suppression movements that have spread across some parts of our country like wildfire.

Foxeyroxie15

12:51 pm on Monday, February 18, 2013

The "Master Lever" site is self-explanatory. By using it, your vote may not register on such pols that are non-partisan (i.e. School Committee). Every vote should count. It's also an archaic, party-driven tool, instituted at a time when our grandparents had just come here, weren't educated, many illiterate. Think back to your history books - Boss Tweed, others and how they used it to manipulate votes. We are truly a lazy society. The voting machines are gone yet we stopped & pulled each lever. Now, all we have to do is mark a piece of paper with a pen - no bending down to make sure we pulled a lever. The only things we have to do now are 1) know your candidates, 2) get to the polls and 3) vote for the person you feel will do the job - not all follow the party lines to the letter. And PLEASE - read the referendum items that are sent to you!! NOT the 'headline' - read the fine print at the bottom. There is the actual cost of the long term 'bond', not the amount stated in the headline, how long we have to pay on this 'bond' . Stay informed and vote !

Reply

Bill Carson

1:02 pm on Monday, February 18, 2013

Do you think they will approve another one million dollar bond to repair the turbine? Any scoop on the wind turbine repairs ?Any votes on the repairs or public discussion?

Reply

mike westman

3:40 pm on Monday, February 18, 2013

How many of you righties actually split ticket? come on now. Chafee did get elected.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Leave RI

7:10 pm on Monday, February 18, 2013

Mike..if that's a general "how many" ..I did..and non for er ahhh HIM...if it wasn't a general question and was meant for someone I'll start tapering off the Redbull and Ambien cocktail.

Comment_arrow

mike westman

8:36 am on Tuesday, February 19, 2013

by the way....so do many of us on the middle. Thoughtful is as thoughtful is.

Rags 1

5:11 pm on Monday, February 18, 2013

A very high per centage of voters are not enrolled or independent.
They split their ticket.
The master lever should go the way of the 5 cent cigar.
Maybe then, issues and not party affilation will mean something. Republicans signing "no tax" pledges to a third unelected person in violation of their constitutional oath that may require them to raise taxes is absured. That is just one example.

Reply

William F Horan

5:54 pm on Monday, February 18, 2013

The Portsmouth WTG REPAIR, unworkable business models examined? Are THE WHEELS TURNING TO BAIL OUT THIS MISADVENTURE AT THE RI GA AND ITS EDC? Yes, if accurate then an additional plunder of the state wide tax payer and utility rate payer. This Pts Industrial WTG is a case study in a collective ignorance, arrogance and incompetence fueled by the misguided green political cult of true believers.

Yes, All has been very quiet as to RI GA EDC EBEC & The Portsmouth Industrial Wind Turbine project. Expect the revenue stream mechanics to shortly make another run at the local, state & Federal tax payers?

The Deep Water Wind - Hedge Fund financed activities is evolving - many modifications of the plans. The recent Newport Daily News opinion page we are in for a healthy finical plunder etc..

Observe the Industrial Wind Turbine Farm Groupies and members of the politically aligned cult of true believers recently at the USN Industrial Wind Farm Project out brief, held at CCRI . That project now depicted as located on and or near many Aquidneck Island west side (bordering all three communities) USN hazardous waste sites and in the Newport Air Park flight corridor). The takeaway from the Environmental out brief was that this is a top down mandated Industrial Wind Turbine Generator solution from Washington, DC with little or no concern for Aquidneck Island - Narragansett bay Basin eco system and its crown jewel. Concerns & Alternative solutions only superficially examined!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Bill Carson

6:36 pm on Monday, February 18, 2013

To: William F Horan , People just don't get it . The taxpayers of Portsmouth lost 3 million in a wind mill scheme and 2 million on a bond .

Pulling a lever ! How about pulling you leg ? Talk about Low Information Voters !

March 10, 2008, the Portsmouth Town Council voted 5-2 to spend $3 million to purchase a 1.65 Megawatt wind turbine at the High School. No one in Rhode Island had to pull a single lever.

The "Wind Power Survey" was the same as a single lever pull. Surveys were mailed to specific residents to gather the opinions of the citizens of Portsmouth through a random sampling of residents. Why not a vote ?

The citizens of Portsmouth never actually voted for a wind turbine they only voted for a loan to buy one.

The town still owes and has been paying a $2.3 million dollar bond payments while the turbine sits idle. The voters of Portsmouth approved the bond obligation to build the wind turbine.

Now you know what a Low Information Voter is . The voters of Portsmouth only listened to the affirmative side of the wind turbines sales pitch. These turbines had been having gear box problems for years before they came to Portsmouth .

Arthur Christopher Schaper

7:58 pm on Monday, February 18, 2013

Pull the Master Lever for Good.

Let voters choose their legislators.

They should also favor more open primaries and a Citizens Commission, which will let the citizens draw the legislative districts, not the politicians.

Go, Rhode Island, Go!

Reply
Comment_arrow

mike westman

8:38 am on Tuesday, February 19, 2013

so buddy....lets apply that to Texas, Pa and other repub controlled states that have made gerrymandering an alchemy that makes one vote in Texas equal 10 votes in New York......anything to unlevel the playing field

Bill Carson

8:46 am on Tuesday, February 19, 2013

Did they vote on wind turbine repairs? Must be in so-called "executive session". What happened to the Rhode Island Open Meetings Act (OMA) ?

Reply

Leave a comment